In a lawsuit filed Sept. 13, the confederacy claims Poitras’ time period as Alberta regional chief ended on June 30. It says she has repeatedly refused to relinquish the position to a gaggle of grand chiefs within the absence of an election, as legally required.
The confederacy, representing 17 member nations, additional alleges Poitras operated by way of the Meeting of First Nations Alberta Affiliation (AFNAA), a corporation it claims has no authorized standing with the AFN and of which Poitras has been president since changing into regional chief.
“Throughout her tenure, Poitras sought and obtained funding straight from the AFN and with out the information of the confederacy,” the lawsuit states. “Poitras then operated the AFN regional workplace, covertly, by way of the (AFNAA).”
Poitras had a authorized obligation, the lawsuit claims, to channel these funds by way of the workplace of a provincial territorial group such because the confederacy. It says this responsibility, and the opposite guidelines governing her position and time period restrict, are set by the Meeting of Treaty Chiefs (AOTC). The confederacy is a member of that meeting.
Funding agreements filed as courtroom displays present the AFN supplied practically $1.2 million to the AFNAA between July 2018 and April 2021 for prices associated to the position of regional chief. Poitras is the AFNAA signatory on the agreements.
The assertion of declare alleges Poitras has “constantly taken her path from the (AFNAA) board as an alternative of the AOTC and the member nations,” stymieing the confederacy’s entry to monetary data and failing to seek the advice of with its members.
The group is searching for an emergency injunction that will stop Poitras from performing as AFN regional chief.
Poitras, a member of Mikisew Cree First Nation, was elected for a three-year time period in February 2018. She is the primary girl ever to carry the position.
The AFN didn’t reply to a number of requests for remark. Poitras is listed as regional chief on the meeting’s web site.
Poitras calls this try to ‘unjustly’ take away her
The lawsuit states the confederacy is searching for a courtroom order that will bar Poitras from performing as regional chief and persevering with to function and “divert funds” by way of the AFNAA.
It additionally needs an order barring the AFNAA — named as a defendant within the lawsuit — from utilizing or “dissipating” sure funds supplied to it, and one directing the “well timed winding up and dissolution” of the group.
Poitras and the AFNAA haven’t but filed statements of defence.
However in a joint information launch earlier this week, they stated the confederacy’s courtroom purposes “try to unjustly take away the regional chief from elected workplace.”
The discharge stated it’s unclear why the AOTC didn’t maintain an election by June 2021 however Poitras “would welcome an election name and the conventional democratic course of contemplated by the AOTC’s phrases of reference to decide on the regional chief.
“Removed from making an attempt to restrict or keep away from that election course of, the regional chief has repeatedly requested that the AOTC maintain the regional chief election,” it continued.
The AFNAA receives cash to supply workplace and administrative assist to the regional chief, the discharge stated.
Not one of the allegations by both facet has been confirmed in courtroom.