The Philippines skilled one other surge in COVID-19 infections within the third quarter of 2021 because of the fast unfold of the Delta variant. The surge has dampened the nation’s likelihood for an financial rebound, additional strained the already fragile well being system and uncovered the inept technique of the federal government, which has struggled to stability opening the economic system and defending public well being.
The spike in instances prompted one other arduous lockdown in Manila in August 2021. Within the Philippines, the federal government beneath President Rodrigo Duterte applied extreme measures to curb the unfold of the virus, together with one of many world’s longest lockdowns. First imposed on 15 March 2020, modified lockdowns stay in place at present.
Regardless of the lockdowns, the Philippines has didn’t flatten its COVID-19 curve. Speedy virus transmission occurred as a result of despite the fact that the federal government restricted mobility, many individuals needed to proceed to go away their properties to earn a dwelling. Solely US$100–$160 price of support has been distributed to every household for the reason that begin of the pandemic. Staying at dwelling will not be an possibility for the poor, notably displaced casual employees and labourers of small companies. A authorities survey performed in April 2021 revealed that 62.1 per cent of Filipino households have skilled meals shortages through the pandemic. Social safety measures have been severely insufficient.
The lockdown intervals weren’t used successfully to construct extra sturdy well being infrastructure. The Division of Well being leaned on native authorities models (LGUs) for the pandemic response, with out sufficiently augmenting their assets and capability. Given the disparity within the resourcing of LGUs and the spike in infections, the native public well being system grew to become overwhelmed.
The federal government’s pandemic response, the Bayanihan Act, allotted 8.6 per cent of GDP or round US$30 billion to finance well being and financial packages. But this fiscal response within the Philippines is comparatively meagre in comparison with the pandemic warfare chest of different middle-income ASEAN international locations, such Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand.
To make issues worse, an enormous chunk of the Philippine pandemic fund was misplaced to poor administration and corruption. Based mostly on studies of the Fee on Audit, round 9 billion pesos (US$170 million) was not used. The unused funds needed to be returned to the Nationwide Treasury as a result of the deadline for disbursement expired in June 2021. That quantity might have been used to finance essential upgrades of public hospitals and financially assist well being employees, a lot of whom resigned attributable to overwork, low compensation and unpaid hazard pay.
A Philippine Senate investigation additionally uncovered anomalous offers involving President Duterte’s shut aids and high authorities officers, following a Fee on Audit report that flagged transactions involving 67 billion pesos (US$1.3 billion) price of public funds. That quantity might have made an enormous distinction in boosting the assets of LGUs for his or her COVID-19 healthcare centres and social safety packages.
The Philippines scores poorly in worldwide surveys performed on COVID-19 authorities responses. Bloomberg’s COVID-19 Resilience Rating positioned the Philippines on the backside of 53 main economies surveyed in September 2021 by way of virus containment, vaccination protection and opening up of the economic system. Nikkei Asia’s COVID-19 Restoration Index ranks the Philippines final out of 121 international locations surveyed concerning an infection management, vaccination and mobility. The Worldwide Financial Fund lowered its 2021 development outlook for the Philippines to three.2 per cent from a projected 5.4 per cent attributable to its uncertainty of restoration.
Regardless of the nation’s dismal pandemic efficiency, no person within the Duterte authorities has been made accountable for its failures. Whereas President Duterte’s approval ranking suffered a big drop, as of 29 October 2021 it stays at 52 per cent, which is assessed as ‘excellent’ by polling and analysis establishment the Social Climate Stations.
Earlier than his time period ends, President Duterte wants to noticeably deal with correcting the weak spot of his pandemic response. A calibrated, people-focused well being and financial coverage response is required for a resilient restoration. If lockdowns are applied, extra beneficiant and focused social safety measures needs to be supplied. If the economic system is opened, it needs to be accompanied by comfortable mitigation measures and big investments in public well being in anticipation of a attainable surge in infections. Assist for LGUs, notably in metropolis centres, needs to be intensified to satisfy the wants of communities as they put together for the opening of wider sections of the economic system.
The federal government’s incompetent pandemic response has already resulted in hundreds of lives misplaced and severe financial setbacks to what was as soon as lauded the brand new tiger economic system of Asia. Duterte’s reputation allowed him to get away with a botched pandemic response. Because the Presidential election in 2022 looms, the largest problem for the opposition is how one can make the folks perceive the connection between management failure and the financial and well being devastation that the nation is experiencing. The demand for accountable, competent and compassionate management have to be unleashed.
Jenny D Balboa is a lecturer on the Tokyo College of International Research.